This contribution is the Chinese national report in a special issue comparing the part played by the highest courts of the principal arbitral jurisdictions. It examines how the Supreme People’s Court shapes international arbitration in China: through its supervision of the validity of arbitration agreements, its role in the recognition and enforcement of foreign and foreign-related awards, and the judicial interpretations and guidance by which it unifies the practice of the lower courts. The report pays particular attention to the prior reporting system, under which a lower court intending to refuse enforcement of an award must refer the matter upwards, and situates that mechanism within China’s wider effort to establish arbitration-friendly credentials while retaining central judicial oversight. Read alongside the companion reports on other jurisdictions, it offers a comparative benchmark for assessing the predictability of Chinese judicial control of arbitration.
Kun Fan serves as arbitrator and mediator in international commercial and domain name disputes, working in English, Chinese and French.